I just read this on The Register. 5TB drives! Can you imagine it! The HDD manufacturers continue to push the envelope even further.
Now I have a concern about drives getting to this size and that's the ability to get data on/off the drive itself. With 73/146/300GB drives, the capacity to response time ratio is still within a tolerance that means adequate random access throughput can be achieved. But with larger drives the number of different concurrent accesses will increase and if response time doesn't decrease then very large HDDs will start to operate like sequential devices.
I think I need an illustration to make my point. Imagine a 73GB drive is receiving 200 random I/Os per second, each with an average 5ms response time. Scale the capacity up to a 5TB drive and that's about 69 times the capacity. The scaled up drive would have to cope with 13800 I/Os a second and provide an average response time of 0.07ms!
Firstly, it is unlikely 5TB drives will be expected to perform like today's 73GB drives but it serves to illustrate that we can't expect to simply consolidate and shrink the number of drives installed into an array. We need something more.
I think we need a more innovative approach to the design of the drive interface. This may simply be shed loads of cache, to improve the overall average response time, or perhaps multiple virtual interfaces per drive or independently mobile read/write heads which don't need to read/write a cylinder at the same time. It could even be drives that dynamically reallocate their data to make read/write quicker (for example, put frequently read/write blocks in the same physical area of the drive).
Who knows what the solution is, but rest assured something needs to happen to make 5TB drives useful devices.
Showing posts with label HDD. Show all posts
Showing posts with label HDD. Show all posts
Friday, 4 July 2008
5TB drives
Thursday, 4 January 2007
Hybrid Storage Alliance
Fujitsu, Hitachi, Toshiba, Samsung and Seagate are getting together as the Hybrid Storage Alliance to promote the use of HDDs with large amounts of additional cache. They've set up a (not so snazzy) website at www.hybridstorage.org (check out the builder on the features page - when did you last see a builder using a laptop, never mind understanding what a hard disk is).
It's good news. I love the idea and have mentioned my thoughts before. I also think that onboard cache provides more options to develop the successor to RAID, although I'm still thinking how it could be done.
Sandisk also announced the device shown on the right - a solid state HDD. After 50 years, the hard disk is seeing some exciting changes.
It's good news. I love the idea and have mentioned my thoughts before. I also think that onboard cache provides more options to develop the successor to RAID, although I'm still thinking how it could be done.
Sandisk also announced the device shown on the right - a solid state HDD. After 50 years, the hard disk is seeing some exciting changes.
Full details of the Sandisk announcement at http://www.sandisk.com/Corporate/PressRoom/PressReleases/PressRelease.aspx?ID=3654.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)